Legal Opinion

Hines v. Allstate Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 11, 1998No. 4-97-0368PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Plaintiffs, Ronald and Shirley Hines (the Hines), brought this action against defendant Allstate Insurance Company, seeking to recover additional living expenses covered by a homeowners policy. Allstate defended on the basis that the Hines failed to exercise due diligence in resolving their claim and failed to file suit within the one year required by the policy. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the Hines. Allstate appeals. We affirm.

The Hines suffered a fire loss at their home on May 23, 1992. The Hines’ policy provided the following coverages: (1) loss of contents; (2) repair…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Bazydlo v. VolantIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Trinity Bible Baptist Church v. Federal Kemper InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Vala v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. American Access Casualty Co. v. TutsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. Greeling v. AbendrothAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Greeling v. AbendrothAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Kang v. Travco Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API