Legal Opinion
Hurd Committee v. Prudence Realization Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 4, 1945No. 349PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. Appellee urges that the motion of April 17, 1944, proposed specific changes and modifications in the plan, and that we cannot say, on appeal from the order of June 27, 1944, denying that motion, that the court below abused its discretion in refusing to adopt those specific changes. However, as that motion contained a prayer for general relief, we think the question of the subordination of the certificates held by the guarantor is properly before us on the appeal from the order denying that motion.
2. The Hurd Committee argues that the doctrine of Prudence Realization…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Prudence Realization Corp. v. GeistSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Prudence Realization Corp. v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ferris v. Prudence Realization Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Geist v. Prudence Realization Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Delatour v. Prudence Realization Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- In re Espade Reality Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1946
- Jackson v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Victoria A. Hart v. David W. Hedrick, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Seminole Park and Fairgrounds,inc., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968