United Pacific Insurance v. Mottner (In Re Massart Co.)
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REVERSING DECISION OF UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
ROTHSTEIN, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the court on plaintiff United Pacific Insurance Company’s appeal from the decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court. Having reviewed the record, together with all documents filed in support and in opposition, and being fully advised, the court finds and rules as follows:
I. FACTS
The parties do not dispute the underlying facts in this matter. On November 9,1988, debtor Massart Company (“Massart”) signed a public works contract known as “Lakewood Pump Stations Phase II” with Pierce…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Transamerica Title Insurance v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Newcomer v. MasiniCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Cone Constructors, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3185, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4396 Reliance Insurance Co., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. U.S. Bank of Washington, N.A., a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Columbia State BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Reliance Insurance v. U.S. Bank of Washington, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. HeidkampDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.