Legal Opinion

Mallicott v. Nelson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1956No. 33485PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The principal question presented in this case is whether the action, which is based on a claim timely filed in the administration of the estate of O. W. Harris, deceased, was prematurely commenced. Appellant contends that she, as administratrix of the estate, had not yet rejected the claim when the action was instituted. This is the basis of the first assignment of- error.

The other assignments challenge findings of fact Nos. 3 to 8, inclusive, the conclusion of law predicated thereon, and the entry of judgment establishing respondent’s claim as a general claim against the estate in the sum of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Paulson v. HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zmijewski v. WrightWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Grasser v. BlakkolbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Marquam v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Johnston v. Von HouckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Howard v. BarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API