Legal Opinion

Smith v. Michigan State Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Eaton. (Smith, J.) Bill to redeem from an execution sale, and to declare the validity of certain mortgages. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. It appears that on March 17, 1891, Edward Snybh, who is the husband of complainant, was the owner and in possession of certain premises in Eaton Eapids, this State. Prior to that date, Delilah Witt had recovered a judgment against him for the sum of $400 and upwards. An execution had been issued upon such judgment, and placed in the hands of defendant Pollock, who was the sheriff of Eaton county. A levy was made on the premises under such execution on March 20, 1891, and the premises sold July 8 thereafter, but the certificate of sale made by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Banning v. SabinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Griffith v. FoxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Pellston Planing Mill & Lumber Co. v. Van WormerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API