Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Crippen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 13, 1987No. 3-87-0063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

In 1982, Kenneth Hoover, the plaintiff, and Crippen, Reid and Bowen, the defendants, established a partnership for the practice of accounting. The firm name was Crippen and Hoover. Paragraph 11 of the partnership agreement provided in part:

“Each partner shall be entitled to an allocation of his proportionate share of the profits in excess of any profits specially allocated (referred to herein as base salaries, but not in a taxation sense) to Partners of the Partnership as his interest in the capital in the Partnership bears to the total capital ***.”

The partnership also entered into a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. RizzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ellerby v. SpiezerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Couri v. CouriIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hoover v. CrippenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Chicago Budget Rent-A-Car Corp. v. MajAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Illinois, Inc. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Hallmark & Johnson Properties, Ltd. v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. In Re Marriage of KampAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Village of Alsip v. PortincasoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. The Estate of Rudolph Isley v. IsleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API