Legal Opinion

City of East St. Louis v. St. John

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clinton county; the Hon. Silas L. Betas, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

This was an application by the city of East St. Louis to condemn and appropriate a lot belonging to appellee, for the purpose of erecting a city prison. Appellant claims to derive authority to condemn and appropriate this property for the purpose indicated, under the fourth article of the city charter, adopted on the 16th day of February, 1865. (Sess. Laws, 352.) It declares that “ The city shall have power to acquire, to open and to lay out public grounds, or squares, streets, alleys and highways, and to alter, widen, contract, straighten and discontinue the same. * * * They shall cause all…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. B. & O. Railroad v. P. W. & Ky. RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Ligare v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. County of Mercer v. WolffIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Warner/elektra/atlantic Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. County of Dupage, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Goddard v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API