French v. Bragg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
PER OURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order of the court refusing to vacate an order confirming sale. On the 18th day of February, 19-36, defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss upon jurisdictional grounds. We have examined the authorities cited by the movant herein, and they reasonably sustain the proposition urged by the defendant in error that the appeal was not perfected by due and proper service and settlement of the case-made. Upon such examination we called for response on the part of the plaintiff in error, to which order of the court the plaintiff in error has not seen fit to…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Finch v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- In Re Williams' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Niles v. NilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Blumhoff v. AkersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Duke v. City of Checotah Ex Rel. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.