Binford v. Reid
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.
The action of the superior court in granting or refusing a proper application to change the name of a person is based solely on a sound legal discretion; and where, upon the hearing of the application of Dorothy Lowe Reid under the provisions of Chap. 79-5 of the Code (Ann. Supp.), § 79-501, to change the name of the applicant’s minor son from “Henry Arthur Binford III” to “George Lowe Reid,” it appears that the applicant is the divorced wife of the objector, Harry Arthur Binford Jr., that Harry Arthur Binford III was born on September 18, 1945, that the applicant separated from the objector…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Clinton v. MorrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Don v. DonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Fulghum v. PaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Johnson v. CogginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.