Legal Opinion
People v. Fury
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 10, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
No appearance for respondent.
Finch, J.
The defendant-respondent, John Fury, was convicted of the crimes of burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the first degree. Subsequently he was charged with being a second felony offender within the meaning of section 1941 of the Penal Law, in that he had previously been convicted in a United States District Court for the Western District of New York of the crime of uttering a counterfeit Federal reserve bank note in violation of section 265 of title 18 of the United States Code, and he was sentenced to serve, as a second felony offender, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. MarigoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- United States v. ArjonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- People v. CarlesiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- People v. . CarlesiNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. McCulloughNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- People v. BroadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- People Ex Rel. Marks v. BrophyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- State v. ScaranoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.