Bryant v. Warden
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY BRYANT, Petitioner, v. CAUSE NO. 2:17-CV-225-JTM-JEM WARDEN, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER Christopher Anthony Bryant, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion asking the court to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). “Altering or amending a judgment under Rule 59(e) is permissible when there is newly discovered evidence or there has been a manifest error of law or fact.” Harrington v. City of Chicago,
433 F.3d 542, 546
(7th Cir. 2006). “But such motions are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Richard F. Harrington, Tavares Harrington, Tyjuan Kidd v. City of Chicago, Officer Delgado, Officer MoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Floyd Richardson v. Michael LemkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.