Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Warden

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 15, 2021No. 2:17-cv-00225Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY BRYANT, Petitioner, v. CAUSE NO. 2:17-CV-225-JTM-JEM WARDEN, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER Christopher Anthony Bryant, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion asking the court to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). “Altering or amending a judgment under Rule 59(e) is permissible when there is newly discovered evidence or there has been a manifest error of law or fact.” Harrington v. City of Chicago,

433 F.3d 542, 546

(7th Cir. 2006). “But such motions are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Richard F. Harrington, Tavares Harrington, Tyjuan Kidd v. City of Chicago, Officer Delgado, Officer MoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Floyd Richardson v. Michael LemkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API