Legal Opinion

State v. M.M.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 22, 2011No. 5D10-3856PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMonaco, J.

The State appeals the trial court’s determination that it did not have jurisdiction to issue a restitution order because more than sixty days had passed from the dispo*1162sition. The appellee, M.M., properly and admirably concedes error. We reverse.

M.M. was charged by petition for delinquency with one count of burglary of a dwelling and one count of criminal mischief. M.M. entered into a plea agreement with the State in which he agreed to plead no contest to burglary of a dwelling, in return for the State dropping the criminal mischief count. The plea agreement also provided that M.M. was to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ridley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MMDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API