Legal Opinion

Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 2 of Garfield Cty. v. Beeson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 1911No. 3049PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Garfield Coimty; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by Ira L. Beeson and others against Consolidated School District No. 2 of Garfield County and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This is an action begun in the district court of Garfield county by Ira L. Beeson, Bismarlc Ripley, and Edwin Getz to enjoin plaintiffs in error, Emil Jupe, treasurer, E. E. Landis, director, Stephen A. Beck, clerk, of consolidated school district No. 2, Garfield county, Okla., from selling certain properties formerly owned by school districts 1, 2, 23, and 24 (which were consolidated May 5, 1911, under the name of consolidated school district No. 2 of Garfield county, and which is the real party plaintiff in error herein), and that pending a hearing and proceedings to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. FoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Hays v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Moore v. School Dist. No. 71 of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nordman v. School District No. 43Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Worrell v. LandisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Opinion No. 72-231 (1972) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1972
  4. Opinion No. 72-231 (1972) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API