Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Green v. Neill

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 24, 2004No. SC 85534PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

Relators (defendants in a medical malpractice claim) seek a writ of prohibition barring Respondent from taking any further action other than transferring the underlying case to a proper venue. Relators argue that fellow defendant Malaika Horne, Ph.D., a member of the board of curators of the University of Missouri and resident of the City of St. Louis at the time the petition was filed, was joined pretensively so that plaintiffs could obtain venue in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis.

Plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action against Curator Horne.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanley v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. Smith v. Consolidated School District No. 2Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. SSM Health Care St. Louis v. NeillSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. State Ex Rel. Malone v. MummertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  5. Davis-Bey v. Missouri Department of CorrectionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dibrill ex rel. Wheeler v. Normandy Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State Ex Rel. McDonald's Corp. v. MidkiffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  3. Higgenbotham v. Pit Stop Bar & Grill, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State Ex Rel. Bannister v. GoldmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Charles Lewis v. Kimberly GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API