Legal Opinion
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1991No. 89-70134PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
The Railway Labor Executives’ Association (“RLEA”), the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (“IAM”) and the United Transportation Union (“UTU”)1 petition for review of a decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC” or “Commission”) declining to impose protective conditions for railway employees under 49 U.S.C. § 11347.2 We *963affirm in part and remand to the ICC for further proceedings.
I
Various facets of this case have been pending before the ICC. Santa Fe Industries (“SFI”), a holding company for the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New York Dock Railway and Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. LowdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Railway Labor Executives Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Northwestern Pacific Railroad Co., Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991