Gibson v. Crawford
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1DissentWillis, J.
I cannot concur in the conclusion of the court. because I believe the result to be unjust, unreasonable, and unsupported by authority.
It is unjust because it deprives a faithful wife of the fruits of a fair contract after she had rendered full performance of the consideration. It sets the seal of judicial sanction upon a glaring fraud on the rights of a confiding spouse who trusted her husband and relied upon his solemn agreement.
It is unreasonable because it extends a statutory rule beyond its terms and applies it to a situation it was not enacted to reach or intended to govern. It defeats…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Carmichael v. CarmichaelMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Stewart v. ToddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Stevens v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Brown v. WebsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.