Legal Opinion

McCorkle v. Herrmann

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, Hew York county

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

The plaintiff, by his complaint, alleged his due appointment as receiver of one John J. Murphy in proceedings supplementary to execution, and that Murphy had entered into a contract with the defendant to perform certain work, labor, and services, and to furnish certain materials, in completing and furnishing a building for the defendant for a price agreed upon; that Murphy duly performed his contract, and by virtue thereof there was due and payable to the plaintiff, as receiver, the sum of $1,400; which sum the plaintiff has duly demanded, and payment had been refused. The answer admits the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spengler v. Stiles-Tull Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Cogan v. Conover Manufacturing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  3. City of Ithaca v. CornellNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Cooper v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API