Legal Opinion

State v. Kysar

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1988No. 17039PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

Dale Kysar stands accused of robbery. The case comes to us on appeal by the state from an order suppressing inculpatory statements made by Kysar during custodial police interrogation. The sole question presented is whether the statements were made voluntarily. For reasons explained below, we conclude that they were not. Accordingly, we affirm the suppression order and remand the case for further proceedings.

The underlying facts may be stated briefly. Dale Kysar and his brother David were charged with robbing a Pizza Hut restaurant in Idaho Falls. After Dale was booked into the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. State v. PowersIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. SpradlinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. NoblesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State v. WoolfIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API