Legal Opinion

DeRose v. DeRose

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2003No. Docket 121246PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This case presents a dispute under the grandparent visitation statute, MCL 722.27b, between a mother, Theresa Seymour,1 and a paternal grandmother, Catherine DeRose, who sought visitation with her granddaughter. The trial court ordered limited visitation, and the mother appealed. The Court of Appeals held that this statute was unconstitutional. We affirm.

I. FACTS

The child at issue in this case was bom during the marriage of Theresa and Joseph DeRose. In 1997, Joseph DeRose was sentenced to twelve to twenty years in prison after pleading guilty of first-degree criminal sexual conduct (csc-i)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Phillips v. Mirac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding Constitutionality of 2005 Pa 71Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hunter v. HunterMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  5. 46th Circuit Trial Court v. Crawford CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API