Legal Opinion

Tubbs v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 2006No. CR 06-945Published

1Per curiam

AppeEant Stacy Tubbs has filed a motion to substitute privately retained counsel, James Bennett, in place of his court-appointed attorney, Robert Jeffrey, to represent him in his appeal pending before this court.

In the present case, the motion to substitute counsel was filed by Bennett. Jeffrey has heretofore not filed a motion to withdraw, as required by Rule 16 of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure — Criminal, stating reasons for the attempted withdrawal. Moreover, he has continued to act, both prior to and subsequent to the present motion, on Appellant’s behalf. Thus, we deny the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brewer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Brewer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API