Moore v. State

Moore was charged with robbery. He requested that the jury be instructed upon the lesser included offenses of assault with intent to commit robbery, grand larceny, assault with intent to commit grand larceny, petit larceny and assault with intent to commit petit larceny. The court gave instructions on robbery, grand larceny, petit larceny and assault. The jury found appellant guilty of robbery. Appellant alleges that the refusal to grant the requested instructions was reversible error.

*815On the authority of the supreme court’s decision in State v. Terry, 336 So.2d 65 (Fla.1976), we are compelled…