Legal Opinion

Reedal v. Reedal

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 2008No. DA 08-0158Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

¶1 Before this Court are the following: Appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal; appellees’ motion for extension of time to file cross-appeal; appellants’ response opposing appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal; and intervenor’s reply to appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal. Each is supported by a short memorandum of law.

¶2 Starting with their motion to dismiss this appeal, appellees claim that appellant’s Notice of Appeal was not timely filed. In that regard, it is necessary that we begin by noting that under M. R. App. P. 3:

All time limits set forth in [the Montana…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SchindlerMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Clark Fork Coalition v. Montana Department of Environmental QualityMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Mountain West Bank, N.A. v. Western Skys Ltd.Montana Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API