Legal Opinion · Dissent

Snowton v. Sewerage and Water Bd.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 17, 2009No. 2008-C-399Published

1DissentJohnson, J.

hi respectfully dissent.

LSA-Const. Art. V, § 8(b) provides:

*171A majority of the judges sitting in a ease must concur to render judgment. However, in civil matters only, when a judgment of a district court is to be modified or reversed and one judge dissents, the case shall be reargued before a panel of at least five judges prior to rendition of judgment, and a majority must concur to render judgment. (Emphasis added).

Admittedly, the Office of Workers’ Compensation is not a “district court,” but, rather, an administrative agency. However, in my view, it is necessary to treat workers’ compensation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. RoemerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Albe v. LOUISIANA WORKERS'COMPENSATION CORP.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. Long v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API