Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc. v. James

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 31, 2002No. 1950030, 1950031, 1950240, 1950241, 1950408, and 1950409Published

1ConcurrenceHouston, Justice

I concur.

If the State of Alabama had requested that this Court set aside the Liability Order in this litigation, I would have voted to do so for the following reasons.

Alabama Code 1975, § 12-2-13, provides:

“The Supreme Court, in deciding each case when there is a conflict between its existing opinion and any former ruling in the case, must be governed by what, in its opinion, at that time is law, without any regard to such former ruling on the law by it .... ”

(Emphasis added.)

In Ex parte James, 713 So.2d 869, 878 (Ala.1997), Justice Cook summarized what is established law:

“ ‘[T]he lack of…

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API