Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Akers

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1965No. 9536PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOREMAN, Circuit Judge.

The Uninsured Motorist Law of Virginia requires that all automobile liability insurance policies issued in the State shall contain an endorsement indemnifying the insured for injury caused by an uninsured motor vehicle. Code of Va., sec. 38.1-381 (b) (Michie 1953 as amended). In the present controversy Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Nationwide) brought an action for declaratory judgment to determine the coverage of an uninsured motorist endorsement contained in a family automobile policy issued to George O. or Daisy Kessler.

The pertinent facts are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beasley v. WolfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JustisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vantine v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1971
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Philip AkersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API