Legal Opinion
Harden v. Dayton Human Rehabilitation Center
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 6, 1981No. C-3-79-159PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE IN ITS ENTIRETY, WITH ONE NON-RELEVANT EXCEPTION; JUDGMENT ON ISSUE OF LIABILITY TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS FOLLOWING ACTION ON MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON ISSUE OF DAMAGES
RICE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Objections to the Magistrate’s Report and Recommended Decision which have been filed by the Defendants, the Dayton Human Rehabilitation Center, the Department of Human Resources, and the City of Dayton (hereinafter referred to as…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Margaret Spaulding, and James Bush, Intervenors-Appellants v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- 30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 624, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,176 Mary Delia Russaw Hardin v. Leroy N. Stynchcomb, 1 Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Percy v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Raymond J. Torres, Franklin J. Utz, and Gerald F. Schmit v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social Services, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Norwood v. Dale Maintenance System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.