Legal Opinion

Mackey v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1956No. 218-53Published

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

Plaintiff sues for an increase in retirement pay under the Career Compensation Act of 1949, 63 Stat. 802, 37 U.S.C.A. § 271 et seq.

Prior to entering on active duty with the Army, plaintiff, in April 1942, was given a physical examination. At that time an X-ray of his chest was negative. He entered on active duty June 16, 1942. While stationed at Fort Clark, Texas, he had a bad cold and was told that X-rays showed something on his lungs but that this had cleared up. Plaintiff left continental United States and reported for duty at Fort Richardson, Alaska, in October 1944. He…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holliday v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  2. Golding v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  3. Golding v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API