Fox v. Fox Valley Trotting Club, Inc.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order requiring the Trotting Club to deposit security in lieu of an appointment of a receiver to collect the Club’s share of pari-mutuel receipts.

Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order was not appealable was taken with the case. The Civil Practice Act (par. 202, chap. 110, Ill. Rev. Stat. [1951, Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 104.078]) authorizes appeals from interlocutory orders appointing receivers, or giving other or further powers or property to receivers already appointed. The Chancery Act (par. 55, chap. 22, Ill. Rev. Stat.…