Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Ladd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 10, 1913No. 835, 836PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Action by G. W. Ladd against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error, and the clerk of the Supreme Court issues execution for costs of a former appeal. On motion to quash execution.

1Per curiam

From a judgment of the county court of Grady county rendered and entered against it, St. Louis &■ San Francisco R. Co., plaintiff in error, defendant below, brought the case here, and this court reversed and remanded the same for a new trial, and taxed the costs of that appeal to the defendant in error, G. W. Ladd. 33 Okla. 160, 124 Pac. 461. After a new trial, pursuant to our mandate,, from a judgment rendered and entered therein against defendant, plaintiff in error, St. Louis & S. F. R. Co., again appeals.

On the 24th day of April, 1913, pending the second appeal, pursuant to praecipe duly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LaddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lisby v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Spillers v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State ex rel. Petcoff v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. State v. SquierNevada Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. MooreNevada Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API