Gilbert v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
At Law. Action for personal injury. On motion by defendant for direction of verdict.
1Opinion of the Court
LOCHREN, District Judge.
Plaintiff introduced his testimony and rested his case, whereupon counsel for defendants moved the •court to instruct the jury to return a verdict for the defendants. After argument by respective counsel, the court rendered the following decision, orally:
Upon this motion of the defendant that the court direct a verdict in favor of the defendant, the rule necessarily and properly is that the evi*833dence in the case adduced by the plaintiff shall be construed most favorably for the plaintiff, and that any facts which establish or tend to establish or support the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morris v. Duluth, S. S. & A. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jenney Electric Manufacturing Co. v. FlanneryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Union Pac. R. Co. v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. HenrieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. PruntyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1904