Legal Opinion

Adams v. Bay City

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The fac.ts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover $215.46, paid by him under protest to the treasurer ,of Bay City. The money was demanded by said treasurer, and the property of plaintiff levied upon by virtue of a local tax roll and the warrant attached thereto, upon which tax roll an assessment was made against plaintiff and certain lots and premises owned by him, for the purpose of defraying a portion of the cost of a sewer. The case was tried before the court without a jury. Findings of fact and law were made and filed, and judgment entered for plaintiff for $230.

In support of the conclusions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warren v. City of Grand HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. White v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Sault Ste. Marie v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API