People Ex Rel. P.S.L. Assur. Soc. v. . Miller
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
I think the tax in this case, or at least a considerable portion of it, was improperly imposed and should have been revised and readjusted by the comptroller upon the petition of the relator. I will state only very briefly my reasons for this conclusion.(1) The tax can be imposed only under the authority of chapter 118 of the Laws of 1901. The relator is a domestic corporation and within the general scope of the statute, but the question is how and to what extent the tax can be lawfully imposed. It has been imposed upon the receipts of the company derived from past transactions and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- People Ex Rel. Mutual Trust Co. v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. UpsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Oleson v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1936
- Commonwealth ex rel. Moore v. P. Lorillard Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Maisel v. J. I. Kislak Mortgage Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961