Legal Opinion
Ohlau v. Kleinert
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Petition for mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.
It is undenied that a proper application was made upon proper plans filed for a permit for the erection of a garage and that on March 29, 1923, the superintendent of buildings issued a permit for the installation of necessary footings for the building in question; that thereupon and before the superintendent endeavored to revoke the permit, contracts had been made in connection with the erection of the garage and the petitioners had become obligated therefor; that on April 7, 1923, the superintendent notified petitioner that he had revoked the permit issued by him on March twenty-ninth; that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. . ChadeayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Southern Leasing Co. v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- People ex rel. Publicity Leasing Co. v. LudwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Southern Leasing Co. v. LudwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- McGuire v. McGuireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ohlau v. KleinertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Ohlau v. KleinertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924