Legal Opinion

Barker v. Jones

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 2, 1981No. 80 C 236PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEAHER, District Judge.

The threshold question which must be addressed in this habeas proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is whether petitioner, now serving a sentence of fifteen years to life on his bargained guilty plea to a State felony murder charge, may prosecute here a constitutional claim of ineffective assistance of counsel after he had forfeited that right in the State courts by becoming a fugitive, resulting in the dismissal with prejudice of his direct appeal. For the reasons indicated below, the Court declines to entertain petitioner’s claim in such circumstances…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Estelle v. DorroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. People v. DrozNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barker v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. People v. GilestrellaNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Barker v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API