Rykowsky v. Bentz
North Dakota Supreme Court
Erom au order of the District Court of Grant County, Hanley, J., defendant appeals. The order denying the motion to vacate should be reversed and the judgment should be vacated. Whittaker v. Warren (S. D.) 86 N. W. 638; Williams v. Fairmont School Dist. 21 N. D. 198; Mougey v. Miller (N. D.) 169 N. W. 735.
1Opinion of the Court
Christianson, Ch. J.
This is an appeal from an order of the District court of Grant county, denying an application made by the defendant, George Bentz, to vacate a default judgment rendered against him on the 21st day of July, 1917, and allowing him to answer the complaint of the plaintiff.
The complaint in this action alleges that the defendant wilfully, wrongfully, maliciously, and unlawfully shot and wounded three horses belonging to the plaintiff, with the intent to vex, annoy, and harm the plaintiff; that the plaintiff has demanded of the defendant settlement for the damages occasioned by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. Fairmount School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Whittaker v. WarrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Shary v. EszlingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Goetz v. GunschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Lamb v. KingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Ellison v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Sargent County Bank v. WentworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.