Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Raney

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1997No. 02S01-9610-CC-00086PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The defendant filed a writ of habeas corpus seeking his freedom from prison on the grounds his commuted sentence had expired prior to being revoked by the Governor. The trial court found that the commuted sentence from life to “22 years to- life” had expired before the Governor’s revocation and granted the defendant’s petition for the writ of habeas corpus. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, holding that the Governor’s commutation was conditional and that the Governor had the authority to revoke the commutation at any time throughout the defendant’s life.

Alt…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Archer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Doyle v. HamptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bowen v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Carroll v. RaneyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  5. State v. HunterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Marteeny v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Lemay v. State, Department of CorrectionTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Daniel B. Taylor v. Donal CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. LeMay v. TDOCTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API