Legal Opinion

Norton v. Charley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1916No. 6619PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Seminole County; Tom D. McKeown, 'Judge. Action by Charley, a minor, by his legal guardian, John Cordell, against Sam Norton and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion of Buddy, and Susie, a minor, by said Buddy, as her mother and next friend, to dismiss this proceeding in error for the reason that defendant in error, .Charley, subsequent to the judgment rendered in this action, and prior to February 6 1914, died intestate in Seminole county, Okla., leaving as his only heirs the said Buddy, his wife, and the said Susie, his daughter and only living ' descendant, and thát no steps have been taken by plaintiffs in error to revive said action. Notice of this motion has been served upon…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Young v. CliffordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API