Legal Opinion

The State v. Robusto.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 2019No. A18A1802PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dillard, Chief Judge.

*579 The State appeals the trial court's grant of Nicholas Robusto's motion to suppress evidence obtained during a traffic stop and subsequent pat-down search, which resulted in him being arrested and charged with possession of heroin and failure to wear a seat belt. Specifically, the State contends that the trial court erred in ruling that the arresting officer's pat-down search was not justified by a reasonable belief that Robusto was dangerous. For the reasons set forth infra , we affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court's ruling, 1 the record shows…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Tasha CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API