Legal Opinion

News Projection Corp. v. Trans-Lux Daylight Picture Screen Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 9, 1928No. Nos. 300-304PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

These five causes were argued as one, and will be considered in one opinion.

Interlocutory decrees have been granted for infringement of claim 3 of the patent granted April 1, 1919, No. 1,299,024, to appellee’s assignor. It is for a machine adapted to project printed stock quotations from tlie ticker tape onto a surface where they will bo visible in enlarged characters for many poisons to see at one time. Claim 3 is relied upon and reads:

“In a stock quotation projector, the combination with a tape guide and means for throwing the images of the printed quotations onto a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Parks v. BoothSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. O'Rourke Engineering Const. Co. v. McMullenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  4. Muser v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  5. Johnson v. Forty-Second Street, M. & St. N. Ave. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morny v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API