Pueblo of San Ildefonso v. Daniel Ridlon and Regents of the University of California
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge:
Appellant Pueblo of San Ildefonso (“Pueblo”), a federally recognized Indian tribe, filed an action under 25 U.S.C. § 3001-3013, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (“NAGPRA”), to secure the return of a piece of Native American pottery from Appellees Daniel Ridlon and the Regents of the University of California. On cross-motions for summary judgment the District Court construed Ridlon’s motion as a motion to dismiss for want of subject matter jurisdiction and dismissed the Pueblo’s action pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1). We vacate the judgment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Joe Aulston and Lola Aulston v. United States of America, and Shell Western E & P, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Donald O. BERNSTEIN, Petitioner, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- Exby-Stolley v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- John Thorpe v. Borough of Jim ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Duy Dac Ho v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Bonnichsen v. United States, Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.