Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hollingsworth v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1980No. 60448, 60449Published

1ConcurrenceSmith, Judge

I agree with the majority that the search of the brief case discovered in the abandoned house was lawful. However, I reach this conclusion for reasons which differ from those expressed in the majority opinion.

In my view, the search was valid, not because “the officer had probable cause to seize the evidence found at this abandoned and condemned dwelling house,” but because the evidence shows that appellant had voluntarily abandoned the brief case and its contents. As stated in Abel v. United States, 362 U. S. 217, 241 (80 SC 683, 4 LE2d 668) (1960), “There can be nothing unlawful in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API