Comerford v. International Harvester Co.

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action at law. Its nature is probably best described by copying count 1, which is as follows:

“Plaintiff claims of the defendant $2,-900.00 as damages for that for about twenty years prior to the 18th day of May, 1936, plaintiff was employed by the defendant under a written contract for his services as long as they were satisfactory, which contract also provided in substance that it could be terminated by the defendant at any time on five days notice to the plaintiff, and during said period of time plaintiff rendered defendant faithful and efficient and satisfactory…