Legal Opinion
Hood v. Keller
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 2, 2007No. 05-4373UnpublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. DANIEL BREEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant James D. Hood, II, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants-Appellees Ronald T. Keller, Richard H. Finan, and Kenneth Morckel. Hood contends that the Defendants violated his First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and free exercise of religion by arresting him pursuant to Ohio statutory authority on Ohio state grounds for publicly preaching his faith without a permit, for which he seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, compensatory damages, costs, and attorney’s fees. The district…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Akeem StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Storey v. Pees (In Re Storey)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- McGath v. Hamilton Local School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Sicherman v. MBNA America Bank, N.A. (In Re Sterba)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- In Re WingerterBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.