Henry v. Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). The action of ejectment is a possessory action, and may be maintained in this State in all cases where there is a legal right of possession against one who wrongfully holds possession from the person having the better right. Hill v. Plunkett, 41 Ark. 465; Ritchie v. Johnson, 50 Ark. 555, 8 S. W. 942, 7 Am. St. Rep. 118; and §§ 3686, 3694, C. & M. Digest. See also Osborne v. Ark. Ter. Oil & Gas Co., 103 Ark. 175, 146 S. W. 122.
It is not necessary to determine what estate is conveyed in the minerals in the land described in the mining leases before discovery…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Osborn v. Arkansas Territorial Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Mansfield Gas Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Hill v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arrington v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Sunbelt Exploration Co. v. Stephens Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Williams v. WattWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Henry v. Gulf Refining Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Benedetto v. Justin Wooten Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.