Legal Opinion

Boatmen's Bank of Pulaski County v. Brooks

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1994No. 18676PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

Boatmen’s Bank of Pulaski County appeals from the denial of a deficiency judgment against Donna S. Brooks after the bank as secured party repossessed and sold a motor vehicle she had purchased. Because the evidence supports a finding that the bank did not comply with the notification requirement of § 400.9-504(3)1 as it pertains to a private sale, we affirm.

When Donna Brooks and her former daughter-in-law, Michelle Brooks, bought a motor vehicle from a dealer in Lebanon, they signed a “motor vehicle installment sale con*782tract and security agreement” that the dealer then assigned…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Fix v. FixSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Graves v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. Eyberg v. ShahMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Young v. Ray America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of DawesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Diamond Bank v. Carter (In Re Carter)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1996
  3. In Re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999
  4. Victory Hills Ltd. Partnership I v. Nationsbank, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. McKesson Corp. v. Colman's Grant Village, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API