J. E. Baker Co. v. Kennedy Refractories Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit by the J. E. Baker Company against the Kennedy Refractories Company and others. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
Aside from any purely legal view of this controversy what has been called “the human-side view” is Janus-faced. The plaintiff advances, as he is justified in doing, this strong claim of merit that at a very critical stage in the experience of the steel industry, which is now of such overwhelming importance to our country and through it to the cause of humanity throughout the world, he came forward with a substitute for Austrian magnesite, the want of which would have crippled, if not paralyzed, that branch of the steel industry which has heretofore been dependent…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Evans v. Warren Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- J. E. Baker Co. v. Kennedy Refractories Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918