Legal Opinion
Nesbitt v. FCNH, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 19, 2014No. Civil Action No 14-cv-00990-RBJPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
R. BROOKE JACKSON, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ Motion, to Compel Arbitration *1369of Individual Claims and to Stay Proceedings [ECF No. 10]. For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, Ms. Nesbitt, filed this action with the Court on April 7, 2014. In her Complaint she alleges violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and numerous state wage and hour laws. According to the Complaint, the defendants are each involved in the management or operation of, or have an ownership interest in, the Steiner…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Green v. Fishbone Safety Solutions, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- Andresen v. IntePros Federal, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Patterson v. Nine Energy Serv., LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Nesbitt v. FCNH, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Memoryten, Inc. v. Silicon Mountain HoldingsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.