Trinchard v. Grace

Plaintiff brought this suit for divorce under the provisions of Act 269 of 1916, alleging that he had lived separate and apart from defendant in this state for more than seven.years.

The defense urged was that plaintiff had *943not had a continuous residence in the state during the seven years immediately preceding the filing of this suit.

The lower court found that plaintiff’s residence had not been continuous for 'the period mentioned, rejected his demands, and hence he prosecutes this appeal.

Opinion.

Plaintiff and defendant were married in 1901, and lived together until they were separated August…