United States v. Cargo of Liquors of Irene C.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, District Judge.
These are two libels, the first for penalties against the vessel; the second for forfeiture of the cargo. The only ground -alleged against the vessel is that she was bound to the United States, and had approached within twelve miles of the coast without having on board a proper manifest. The real charge is that the Irene C was trying to land a cargo of liquor hare. It seams unfortunate that our statutes should not contain a provision subjecting to forfeiture vessels which engage in smuggling operations within the twelve-mile limit or the treaty distance. It would avoid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. 416 Cases G. T. WhiskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Phile v. the Ship AnnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1787
- United States v. 3,500 Cases, More or Less, of Distilled SpiritsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1926
- The Marion PhillisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- United States v. Cargo of Liquors & Sea StoresDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- The Evelyn RuthDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
- The Mazel TovDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1931