Legal Opinion

United States v. Cargo of Liquors of Irene C.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 20, 1930No. Nos. 4197, 4198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge.

These are two libels, the first for penalties against the vessel; the second for forfeiture of the cargo. The only ground -alleged against the vessel is that she was bound to the United States, and had approached within twelve miles of the coast without having on board a proper manifest. The real charge is that the Irene C was trying to land a cargo of liquor hare. It seams unfortunate that our statutes should not contain a provision subjecting to forfeiture vessels which engage in smuggling operations within the twelve-mile limit or the treaty distance. It would avoid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. 416 Cases G. T. WhiskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Phile v. the Ship AnnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1787
  3. United States v. 3,500 Cases, More or Less, of Distilled SpiritsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1926
  4. The Marion PhillisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  5. United States v. Cargo of Liquors & Sea StoresDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
  2. The Evelyn RuthDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
  3. The Mazel TovDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API