Legal Opinion
Hooper v. Exxon Corp.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided September 26, 1983No. Civ. A. 81-182-B, 81-183-B and 81-351-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLOZOLA, District Judge:
These suits were filed to recover damages arising from a vehicular accident which occurred in Grant Parish. Three suits were filed as a result of this accident. Exxon Corporation (Exxon) was named as a defendant in two of the three suits which have been consolidated for trial. In response to the suits filed by Rosemary Elliott Hooper and Mike Hudnall, Exxon has filed a motion for summary judgment. Exxon contends that these plaintiffs’ exclusive remedy against it is under the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Act, R.S. 23:1021, et seq. For reasons which follow, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Benoit v. Hunt Tool Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Johnson v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Dupre v. Sterling Plate Glass & Paint Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Morgan v. Equitable General Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Vaughn v. Baton Rouge General Hosp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- George N. Vanterpool, Marjorie Vanterpool, His Wife v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Brumbaugh v. Marathon Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987